Category Archives: Literary

The 50 in 52 Project Quote of the Day

The 50 in 52 Project Quote of the Day!

“You shall not, for the sake of one individual, change the meaning of principle and integrity, nor endeavour to persuade yourself or me, that selfishness is prudence, and insensibility of danger, security for happiness.”

Elizabeth Bennet
Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen (1813)

I NEED YOUR HELP PLEASE!
I challenged myself to read 50 books in on 1 year (6/1/18 to 6/1/19) as part of the 50 in 52 Project Reading challenge fundraiser to benefit RAINN (Rape, Abuse, Incest National Network)..

I’m asking folks to sponsor me & pledge a $ per book read (any amount. You’ll receive an invoice after 6/1/19 based on the number of books I read. To sponsor me, click HERE.

Please visit the 50 in 52 Facebook page and click LIKE. The post pinned to to the top of the page has tons of info and the list of my 50 books:.

Thank you!

PS After the Jane Austen picture, there is a link to all the 50 in 52 Project blog posts!

#50-in52-Project

#RAINN

Links to all of the 50 in 52 Project Reading Challenge 2018-2019 blog posts

 

The 50 in 52 Quote of the Day

The 50 in 52 Project Quote of the Day!

“Is not general incivility the very essence of love?”
Elizabeth Bennet
Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen (1813)

I challenged myself to read 50 books in on 1 year (6/1/18 to 6/1/19) as part of the 50 in 52 Project Reading challenge fundraiser to benefit RAINN.org (Rape, Abuse, Incest National Network).

I’m asking folks to sponsor me & pledge a $ per book read (any amount. You’ll receive an invoice after 6/1/19 based on the number of book I read. To sponsor me, click HERE.

Please visit the 50 in 52 Facebook page (and click LIKE) – the post pinned to to the top of the page has tons of info and the list of my 50 books.

Thank you!

#50-in52-Project
#RAINN

Links to all of the 50 in 52 Project Reading Challenge 2018-2019 blog posts

 

50 in 52 Project – Book#1 – Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen

The 50 in 52 Project Reading Challenge (2018/19) begins today!
This fundraiser is to benefit www.RAINN.org (Rape, Abuse, Incest National Network).

The 1st book is: Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen (1813)

First line: “It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.”

To sponsor me & pledge, click here: http://bit.ly/50in52Project.
For info on this reading challenge fundraiser, scroll to the bottom of this post.

Jane Austen (1775-1817)
Miss Austen only published four novels during her lifetime: Sense and Sensibility, Pride and Prejudice, Mansfield Park, and Emma. Two more were published by her brother posthumously: Northanger Abbey and Persuasion.

Often called a comedy of manners, Pride and Prejudice concerns Elizabeth Bennet’s struggle against the pragmatism of love. Elizabeth judges an eligible bachelor, Mr. Darcy harshly (and he tries to ignore her nimble mind and beauty). The pair ends up jousting for most of the novel, while her sisters seek husbands, since their father cannot leave his estate to any of them; the Bennets wants to see at least one of their daughters married well.

You may be familiar with some distorted versions of these characters in Bridget Jones’ Diary.

I love this novel, and I can’t wait to revisit it. Jane Austen is very witty writer with warmth for even her most despicable of characters.

FUNDRAISER INFO:
I challenged myself to read 50 books in one year (6/1/18 – 6/1/19) as a fundraiser to benefit www.RAINN.org, the Rape, Abuse, & Incest National Network.

I’m asking folks to sponsor by pledging a $ per book read. You can $1, $2, any amount you like, and you won’t need to pay until after 6/1/19, when you’ll receive an invoice based on the number of books I’ve read. To sponsor me & pledge, click here: http://bit.ly/50in52Project.

To see the complete list of 50 books, go to the 50 in 52 Project Facebook page: www.facebook.com/50.in.52.Project or on this blog. HERE is a link to all of the 50 in 52 Project blog posts.

#50-in-52-Project

The 50 in 52 Project Reading Challenge 2018/19 begins today!

The 50 in 52 Project Reading Challenge 2018-2019 begins today, June 1st! To sponsor me & pledge, click here: http://bit.ly/50in52Project.

My plan is read the 50 books on my list in chronological order. It should be very interesting to see how British and American fiction evolved from 1800 to now. I’m looking forward to tracing modern fiction’s development: Romantic to Victorian to the Transcendental movement to Naturalism and Realism through to the Existentialists and the Beats on towards my favorite literary period, the Modernist movement (roughly 1900-1930s), which effected all kinds of art, including painting and music, finally ending my journey with Post-Modernist and contemporary literature. (If I get that far!)

Modern fiction is sometimes said to have started in roughly 1700 or even around 1750, but I chose 1800 as my starting date. For any kind of art, history, or social science, to name just a few, these dates are just ways of looking at artistic shifts in a cultural light. Usually no one gets hung up on when one period ends and another begins, mainly because those shifts become very easy to detect.

For fun and for arguments sake, I included this literature timeline, covering works from all different countries.

To see the complete list of 50 books, go to the 50 in 52 Project Facebook page: www.facebook.com/50.in.52.Project or to my blog at www.michaelpatrickharrington.com.

I challenged myself to read 50 books in one year (6/1/18 – 6/1/19) as a fundraiser to benefit www.RAINN.org, the Rape, Abuse, & Incest National Network.

I’m asking folks to sponsor by pledging a $ per book read. You can $1, $2, any amount you like,and you won’t need to pay until after 6/1/19, when you’ll receive an invoice based on the number of books I’ve read. To sponsor me & pledge, click here: http://bit.ly/50in52Project.

To follow along with all the 50 in 52 Project blog posts, you can find all the links here: https://www.michaelpatrickharrington.com/the-50-in-52-2018-2019-blog-posts/

#50-in-52-Project

www.facebook.com/50.in.52.Project

The 50 in 52 Project is now on Instagram!

The 50 in 52 Project Reading Challenge is now on Instagram: 50_in_52_Project

Visit the 50 in 52 Project Facebook Page: www.facebook.com/50.in.52.Project

To follow along with all the 50 in 52 Project blog posts, you can find all the links here: https://www.michaelpatrickharrington.com/the-50-in-52-2018-2019-blog-posts/

#50-in-52-Project

 

Links to all of the 50 in 52 Project Reading Challenge 2018-2019 blog posts

Here are links to all of 50 in 52 Project blog posts!

Follow along!

May 14, 2018 blog post

May 17, 2018 blog post

May 21, 2018 blog post

May 28, 2018 blog post

May 29, 2018 blog post

June 1, 2018 blog post

June 1, 2018 blog post (# 2)

June 1, 2018 blog post (#3)

June 3, 2018 blog post

June 6, 2018 blog post

June 7, 2018 blog post

June 11, 2018 blog post

June 13, 2018 blog post

June 17, 2018 blog post

June 19, 2018 blog post

June 25, 2018 blog post

June 26, 2018 blog post

June 29, 2018 blog post

July 4, 2018 blog post

July 8, 2018 blog post

July 19, 2018 blog post

July 20, 2018 blog post

July 26, 2018 blog post

July 26, 2018 blog post (#2)

August 5, 2018 blog post

August 10, 2018 blog post

August 21, 2018 blog post

August 22, 2018 blog post

August 29, 2018 blog post

August 30, 2018 blog post

September 1, 2018 blog post

September 1, 2018 blog post #2

September 3, 2018 blog post

September 16, 2018 blog post

September 17, 2018 blog post

September 23, 2018 blog post

September 24, 2018 blog post

September 28, 2018 blog post

September 29, 2018 blog post

September 30, 2018 blog post

October 3, 2018 blog post

October 4, 2018 blog post

October 5, 2018 blog post

October 5, 2018 blog post #2

October 7, 2018 blog post

October 8, 2018 blog post

October 11, 2018 blog post

October 12, 2018 blog post

October 16, 2018 blog post

October 16, 2018 blog post #2

October 20, 2018 blog post

October 24, 2018 blog post

October 27, 2018 blog post

October 27, 2018 blog post #2

November 2, 2018 blog post

November 2, 2018 blog post #2

November 5, 2018 blog post

November 5, 2018 blog post #2

November 12, 2018 blog post

November 13, 2018 blog post

November 16, 2018 blog post

November 16, 2018 blog post #2

November 20, 2018 blog post

November 21, 2018 blog post

November 21, 2018 blog post #2

November 28, 2018 blog post

November 28, 2018 blog post #2

November 29, 2018 blog post

November 29, 2018 blog post #2

December 2, 2018 blog post

December 2, 2018 blog post #2

December 6, 2018 blog post

December 6, 2018 blog post #2

December 17, 2018 blog post

December 17, 2018 blog post #2

December 20, 2018 blog post

December 20, 2018 blog post #2

December 26, 2018 blog post

December 26, 2018 blog post #2

January 18, 2019 blog post

January 18, 2019 blog post #2

January 18, 2019 blog post #3

January 26, 2019 blog post

January 26, 2019 blog post #2

February 2, 2019 blog post

February 2, 2019 blog post #2

February 5, 2019 blog post

February 5, 2019 blog post #2

February 9, 2019 blog post

February 9, 2019 blog post #2

February 16, 2019 blog post

February 16, 2019 blog post #2

March 1, 2019 blog post

March 1, 2019 blog post #2

March 6, 2019 blog post

March 6, 2019 blog post #2

March 10, 2019 blog post

March 10, 2019 blog post #2

March 16, 2019 blog post

March 16, 2019 blog post #2

March 21, 2019 blog post

March 21, 2019 blog post #2

March 23, 2019 blog post

March 23, 2019 blog post #2

March 26, 2019 blog post

March 26, 2019 blog post #2

March 28, 2019 blog post

March 28, 2019 blog post #2

March 29, 2019 blog post

March 29, 2019 blog post #2

April 9, 2019 blog post

April 9, 2019 blog post

April 12, 2019 blog post

April 12, 2019 blog post #2

April 16, 2019 blog post

April 21, 2019 blog post

April 29, 2019 blog post

May 14, 2019 blog post

May 21, 2019 blog post

#50-in-52-Project
#RAINN

 

 

 

 

Grammar Girl on the new words added to the OED…

New Words Added to the Oxford English Dictionary—Again!

The Oxford English Dictionary added new words again, and this update includes fun words such as “Tom Swifty.” Will “levidrome” be next?

By

Mignon Fogarty,

February 1, 2018

   

Episode #606

The cover of a Tom Swift book from which we get the Tom Swifty jokes

The headline for this article is something of a joke: New Words Added to the Oxford English Dictionary—Again! It’s a joke because I’m implying that it’s unusual for the dictionary to add new words, but the editors actually do it every quarter. But still I love reading the new words and thinking about them, and one of my all-time favorite Grammar Girl episodes is about how words get in the dictionary, so we’ll talk about them a bit today.

Why Do Dictionaries Add Words So Often?

Dictionaries add new words so often because people keep using new words. That’s the short version of how words get in the dictionary: if enough people use them, they get added. If you hear a word you don’t know or don’t understand, and you go to the dictionary to look it up, you want it to be there; so it makes sense for dictionaries to include words as they are used.

British Versus American Dictionaries

An interesting cultural difference that I learned about from Lynne Murphy, who has a great book coming out on the differences between American and British English called “The Prodigal Tongue,” is that Americans are much more likely than the British to view dictionaries as the authority on words, the language bible, so to speak, whereas British readers are more likely to view the dictionary as a book for word lovers.

Is ‘Levidrome’ the New ‘Fetch’?

Another recent news story also highlights how words get in the dictionary. A Canadian boy named Levi Budd came up with the word “levidrome” when he realized there wasn’t a name for a string of letters that spells one word forward and a different word backward, such as “god” and “dog” and “stressed” and “desserts.” They’re kind of like palindromes, but not exactly, so he tacked his name onto the front of the “drome” root and has been campaigning to get his new word listed in dictionaries. I think it’s a useful word, but the bottom line is that he has to get people to use it, and use it repeatedly over a significant period of time, like any other word before dictionaries will include it. As Regina in the movie “Mean Girls” proved, you can’t just make “fetch” happen.

I feel optimistic about “levidrome” though because it is so useful. When I was on vacation I played around with trying to make a game based on levidromes, but nothing I came up with seemed fun enough to actually make into a real game, but Levi’s father said in a news article that teachers are sending him pictures of students making levidrome lists the same way they might make palindrome or homophone lists. So that seems promising.

January 2018 New OED Words

So let’s get to some of the new words that just entered the OED. What words have people been using frequently enough and long enough to convince editors they should be in the dictionary?

“Mansplain” made the list. It’s a combination of the word “man” with the last part of “explain” and means “a man’s action of explaining something needlessly, overbearingly, or condescendingly, especially to women, in a manner thought to reveal a patronizing or chauvinistic attitude).” I see that a lot on Twitter. I think I’ve only started hearing people use “mansplain” in the last four or five years, but the Oxford English Dictionary pins its first use to a LiveJournal post from 2008.

“Hangry” is another new word that I’ve only heard in the last few years, but the OED dates back much farther, all the way back to 1956. It’s a combination of “hungry” and “angry” and to me it is at least as useful as “levidrome.” I mean, I get angry easily when I’m hungry. Who doesn’t?

“Ransomware” is the kind of new word we get because of new technology or, in this case, new technology-related crimes. Ransomware is software that causes some kind of problem, like blocking access to your data, and demands you pay a ransom to fix it. What’s interesting about this word is that it looks like people used it infrequently starting in the 1980s to describe something I think of more as freeware—software that gives you limited access to features free and a full set of features if you pay—but the OED didn’t add the word until this update because it’s now being used frequently to describe the more malicious type of software.

“Snowflake” is another new word or at least a new sense of the word. And what’s interesting to me is that I remember how this word has evolved. It’s been around since 1983, but back then it was a good thing. A snowflake was a special person in a good way. It played on the idea that every snowflake is unique and was used to describe how people, especially children, are all special, cherished, and unique. I distinctly remember President George W. Bush talking about “snowflake babies” who came from frozen embryos left over from in vitro fertilization.

But then people seemed to get annoyed by the idea. For example, in the 1996 book “Fight Club,” the men embrace the philosophy as part of their indoctrination that “You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake. You are the same decaying organic matter as everyone else.” In my mind, “snowflake” ended up falling into the same category as participation trophies.

And then, more recently, “snowflake” has become an insult, a description of someone who is “overly sensitive or easily offended.” And it’s been used often enough and long enough that the editors at the OED believe it needs to be in the dictionary.

The final one I’ll talk about is “Tom Swifty” because I’ve actually been meaning to write about Tom Swifties for a few years. These are a type of joke that goes back to a children’s book series with a main character named Tom Swift. These science-fiction and adventure novels, created by the same man responsible for the Bobbsey Twins, the Rover Boys, Nancy Drew, and the Hardy Boys, were known for their avoidance of the bare word “said.” Tom did not just “say” things. Instead he said enthusiastically, he said bravely, he said happily, he said morosely, and so on.

This led to word play—a type of pun—in which the adverb relates to what Tom was saying, as in the following:

“Welcome to my apartment,” Tom said flatly. (because “flat” is another name for an  apartment)

“The thermostat must be broken,” Tom said hotly.

“Rover went to get the ball,” Tom said fetchingly.

“I’m being held captive,” Tom said guardedly.

The name “Tom Swifty” for this kind of joke dates back to 1963, and the OED finally felt it was time to give the name its due.

All in all, more than 1,100 new words were added in this dictionary update, and I’ll put a link to the whole list on the transcript of this podcast at the Quick and Dirty Tips website.

It’s interesting to watch spellcheckers try to catch up too. My spellchecker knows “mansplain” and “ransomware,” for example, but it doesn’t know “hangry.”

Mignon Fogarty is Grammar Girl and the founder of Quick and Dirty Tips. Check out her New York Times best-seller, “Grammar Girl’s Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing.

 

Patti Smith pays tribute to her late friend, playwright Sam Shepard

Patti’s words cut like steel through the rain.

 

From the New Yorker:

Sam Shepard and Patti Smith at the Hotel Chelsea in 1971.Photograph by David Gahr/Getty

 

My Buddy
By Patti Smith
August 1, 2017

 

He would call me late in the night from somewhere on the road, a ghost town in Texas, a rest stop near Pittsburgh, or from Santa Fe, where he was parked in the desert, listening to the coyotes howling. But most often he would call from his place in Kentucky, on a cold, still night, when one could hear the stars breathing. Just a late-night phone call out of a blue, as startling as a canvas by Yves Klein; a blue to get lost in, a blue that might lead anywhere. I’d happily awake, stir up some Nescafé and we’d talk about anything. About the emeralds of Cortez, or the white crosses in Flanders Fields, about our kids, or the history of the Kentucky Derby. But mostly we talked about writers and their books. Latin writers. Rudy Wurlitzer. Nabokov. Bruno Schulz.

“Gogol was Ukrainian,” he once said, seemingly out of nowhere. Only not just any nowhere, but a sliver of a many-faceted nowhere that, when lifted in a certain light, became a somewhere. I’d pick up the thread, and we’d improvise into dawn, like two beat-up tenor saxophones, exchanging riffs.

He sent a message from the mountains of Bolivia, where Mateo Gil was shooting “Blackthorn.” The air was thin up there in the Andes, but he navigated it fine, outlasting, and surely outriding, the younger fellows, saddling up no fewer than five different horses. He said that he would bring me back a serape, a black one with rust-colored stripes. He sang in those mountains by a bonfire, old songs written by broken men in love with their own vanishing nature. Wrapped in blankets, he slept under the stars, adrift on Magellanic Clouds.

Sam liked being on the move. He’d throw a fishing rod or an old acoustic guitar in the back seat of his truck, maybe take a dog, but for sure a notebook, and a pen, and a pile of books. He liked packing up and leaving just like that, going west. He liked getting a role that would take him somewhere he really didn’t want to be, but where he would wind up taking in its strangeness; lonely fodder for future work.

In the winter of 2012, we met up in Dublin, where he received an Honorary Doctorate of Letters from Trinity College. He was often embarrassed by accolades but embraced this one, coming from the same institution where Samuel Beckett walked and studied. He loved Beckett, and had a few pieces of writing, in Beckett’s own hand, framed in the kitchen, along with pictures of his kids. That day, we saw the typewriter of John Millington Synge and James Joyce’s spectacles, and, in the night, we joined musicians at Sam’s favorite local pub, the Cobblestone, on the other side of the river. As we playfully staggered across the bridge, he recited reams of Beckett off the top of his head.

Sam promised me that one day he’d show me the landscape of the Southwest, for though well-travelled, I’d not seen much of our own country. But Sam was dealt a whole other hand, stricken with a debilitating affliction. He eventually stopped picking up and leaving. From then on, I visited him, and we read and talked, but mostly we worked. Laboring over his last manuscript, he courageously summoned a reservoir of mental stamina, facing each challenge that fate apportioned him. His hand, with a crescent moon tattooed between his thumb and forefinger, rested on the table before him. The tattoo was a souvenir from our younger days, mine a lightning bolt on the left knee.

Going over a passage describing the Western landscape, he suddenly looked up and said, “I’m sorry I can’t take you there.” I just smiled, for somehow he had already done just that. Without a word, eyes closed, we tramped through the American desert that rolled out a carpet of many colors—saffron dust, then russet, even the color of green glass, golden greens, and then, suddenly, an almost inhuman blue. Blue sand, I said, filled with wonder. Blue everything, he said, and the songs we sang had a color of their own.
We had our routine: Awake. Prepare for the day. Have coffee, a little grub. Set to work, writing. Then a break, outside, to sit in the Adirondack chairs and look at the land. We didn’t have to talk then, and that is real friendship. Never uncomfortable with silence, which, in its welcome form, is yet an extension of conversation. We knew each other for such a long time. Our ways could not be defined or dismissed with a few words describing a careless youth. We were friends; good or bad, we were just ourselves. The passing of time did nothing but strengthen that. Challenges escalated, but we kept going and he finished his work on the manuscript. It was sitting on the table. Nothing was left unsaid. When I departed, Sam was reading Proust.

Long, slow days passed. It was a Kentucky evening filled with the darting light of fireflies, and the sound of the crickets and choruses of bullfrogs. Sam walked to his bed and lay down and went to sleep, a stoic, noble sleep. A sleep that led to an unwitnessed moment, as love surrounded him and breathed the same air. The rain fell when he took his last breath, quietly, just as he would have wished. Sam was a private man. I know something of such men. You have to let them dictate how things go, even to the end. The rain fell, obscuring tears. His children, Jesse, Walker, and Hannah, said goodbye to their father. His sisters Roxanne and Sandy said goodbye to their brother.

I was far away, standing in the rain before the sleeping lion of Lucerne, a colossal, noble, stoic lion carved from the rock of a low cliff. The rain fell, obscuring tears. I knew that I would see Sam again somewhere in the landscape of dream, but at that moment I imagined I was back in Kentucky, with the rolling fields and the creek that widens into a small river. I pictured Sam’s books lining the shelves, his boots lined against the wall, beneath the window where he would watch the horses grazing by the wooden fence. I pictured myself sitting at the kitchen table, reaching for that tattooed hand.

A long time ago, Sam sent me a letter. A long one, where he told me of a dream that he had hoped would never end. “He dreams of horses,” I told the lion. “Fix it for him, will you? Have Big Red waiting for him, a true champion. He won’t need a saddle, he won’t need anything.” I headed to the French border, a crescent moon rising in the black sky. I said goodbye to my buddy, calling to him, in the dead of night.
More: